tomaliusz 23216 #72101 Posted October 3, 2014 Zmiana 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Mateusz Dąbrowski #72102 Posted October 3, 2014 (edited) Speedy ( z poprzedniej strony ) w stosunku do analogicznej Daytony (biała tarcza , czarne tarczki subtarcze) z tej samej strony wypada zaskakująco dobrze . W stosunku do tej Daytony tak, ale predaytony go zmiatają (niestety) estetycznie jak dla mnie O, znalazłem na Hodinkee artykuł, który pamiętałem: Edited October 3, 2014 by Mateusz Dąbrowski 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Angelo #72103 Posted October 3, 2014 (edited) Dzieki, mnie tez sie podoba (jestes jedna z nielicznych osob na tym forum ktorym sie zegarki w edycji 'bicolor' podobaja )Od zawsze Mi sie Podobaly...Wygladaja jakos tak zywiej w porownaniu do calych stalowych...A najbardziej podobaja mi sie zlote... Maja tylko jeden jedyny minus...Widac je z kilometrach... Przy dobrej pogodzie i plaskimterenie nawet z 10 Co Do daytony Marzy Mi sie taki stary model... Edited October 3, 2014 by Angelo 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pepepatryk 12078 #72104 Posted October 3, 2014 U nas dzisiaj reprezentanci Swatch Group. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LMed 111 #72105 Posted October 3, 2014 Kolego Angelo , jaka wada ? Im " lepiej" widać Rolka tym lepiej przecież . 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Angelo #72106 Posted October 3, 2014 (edited) Kolego Angelo , jaka wada ? Im " lepiej" widać Rolka tym lepiej przecież . Ja jak ide ulica to panny nie patrza mi w oczy tylko na reke To jest jednak wada A tak na serio to rolex chocby stalowy zwraca na siebie uwage...Zloto ok ale diamenty to juz przesada... W kobiecych jedynie Edited October 3, 2014 by Angelo 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LMed 111 #72107 Posted October 3, 2014 (edited) Moim zdaniem "diamenty" wyjątkowo pasują do Rolka . Edited October 3, 2014 by LMed 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
13lesiu 958 #72108 Posted October 3, 2014 Jest świetny-gratuluję A u mnie dziś,,,,, 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Angelo #72109 Posted October 3, 2014 (edited) To twoj gust...Mi jakos sie niewidza... Cos co i tak jest juz widoczne po dodaniu jeszcze czegos woidocznego staje sie zbyt widoczne, przeladowane, kiczowat...Ale to tylko moje odczucie...Niektorym sie to podoba i nieoceniam ich gustu...Bardzo lubie diamenty, Ale kupuje je zonie Ale skonczmy to bo nie o tym jest ten watek... Edited October 3, 2014 by Angelo 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bartek79 1688 #72110 Posted October 3, 2014 To twoj gust... Dobrze powiedziane. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sneer 147 #72111 Posted October 3, 2014 (edited) W stosunku do tej Daytony tak, ale predaytony go zmiatają (niestety) estetycznie jak dla mnie O, znalazłem na Hodinkee artykuł, który pamiętałem: a pre-moony zjadają pre-daytony Edited October 3, 2014 by sneer 0 Omega Speedmaster 105.002, Rolex GMT 1675, Zenith El Primero A384, Tag Heuer Monaco cal12, Heuer Montreal cal12, Breitling Long Playing, Certina Chronolympic cal234, Zenith Defy Subsea 600mt, Breitling Chronomatic... parę, ...i sam nie wiem kiedy to się skończy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Angelo #72112 Posted October 3, 2014 (edited) To tez kwestia gustu ten i ten zegar jest zacny Daytona z tego co Wiem bazuje na werku Elprimero( jest sie myle to prosze mnie poprawic)Jak jest z ksiezycowka?Czy maja wlasny mechanizm? Edited October 3, 2014 by Angelo 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LMed 111 #72113 Posted October 3, 2014 Kolego Bartek79 , przecież nie powiedziałem ,że mi się to podoba .Powiedziałem tylko , że diamenty świetnie pasują do Rolka . Pozdrawiam . 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bartek79 1688 #72114 Posted October 3, 2014 Kolego Bartek79 , przecież nie powiedziałem ,że mi się to podoba .Powiedziałem tylko , że diamenty świetnie pasują do Rolka . Pozdrawiam .Nie tłumacz się Pasują tak samo jak do AP i Brajtka czy Omegi. Również pozdrawiam 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Mateusz Dąbrowski #72115 Posted October 3, 2014 a pre-moony zjadają pre-daytony To też fakt 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mikołaj N 388 #72116 Posted October 3, 2014 (edited) Nie kłócić się dzieci Wieczorna wrzutka do bazarkowego ogłoszenia Nie spodziewałem się, że po odkurzeniu go z szuflady da mi tyle fanu Edited October 3, 2014 by Mikołaj N 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Angelo #72117 Posted October 3, 2014 Cena tez jakos przemawia na korzysc Omega...Jesli Cena speedego jest z ksiezyca...To daytony skad... Plutona?A jak jest z tymi mechanizmami? 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kacy 6 #72118 Posted October 3, 2014 Wydaje mi się, że Speedmaster to całkowity in-house, ale głowy nie daję 0 Kacper Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Angelo #72119 Posted October 3, 2014 Aha ja tez za tego zenitha w daytonie glowy niedam 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kacy 6 #72120 Posted October 3, 2014 El Primero w Daytonie to akurat 100% prawda 0 Kacper Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sneer 147 #72121 Posted October 3, 2014 (edited) in-house 3019 jest tutaj... speedy ma lemanie 321, który nie jest in-hous'em Omegi rolex miał mechanizm 4030 bazujący na el primerohttp://timetapestry.blogspot.com/2013/11/why-every-watch-loverwith-doh-should.htmlhttp://www.hodinkee.com/blog/a-vintage-watch-nerds-critical-dissection-of-the-rolex-daytona-past-to-present-part-1-3 Edited October 3, 2014 by sneer 0 Omega Speedmaster 105.002, Rolex GMT 1675, Zenith El Primero A384, Tag Heuer Monaco cal12, Heuer Montreal cal12, Breitling Long Playing, Certina Chronolympic cal234, Zenith Defy Subsea 600mt, Breitling Chronomatic... parę, ...i sam nie wiem kiedy to się skończy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mashun 10 #72122 Posted October 3, 2014 (edited) http://www.timeandwatches.com/p/history-of-omega-speedmaster.html Cyt:"The movement of choice was the Calibre 321 that was introduced in 1942 as a joint project between Omega and Lemania, one of Omega's subsidiaries at the time, who supplied it as an ebauche (Lemania cal. 2310). Calibre 321 is recognised as one of the best example of lateral clutch, column wheel controlled chronograph and it was used as a base movement by Breguet, Patek Philippe and Vacheron Constantin in a variety of chronographs. In 1946, the movement was further enhanced by adding protection to magnetic fields and shocks, something that later will prove to be very important to pass NASA tests." Edited October 3, 2014 by mashun 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sneer 147 #72123 Posted October 3, 2014 (edited) http://watchguy.co.uk/guest-post-lemania-273000-the-moon-watch-caliber-321s-lesser-known-cousins/ The story most have read in one form or the other is how Omega started using the caliber 321, at the time known as 27CHRO C12, for their chronographs in the mid 1940s.The development of the 27CHRO C12 movement was conducted by Albert Piguet from Lemania.There are a multitude of explanations on what Omegas role in the development was. The story, as documented by Omega themselves in their reference book “Omega Saga”, is as follows:After the great depression in the late 1920´s and early 1930´s the Swiss watch industry was going through their worst crisis prior to the Quartz onslaught of the 1970´s. So in 1930 Omega and Tissot joined together under a common umbrella called SSIH (Société Suisse pour l’Industrie Horlogère).Lemania was at the time known as a relatively small volume, but high quality, manufacturer of complicated watches like chronographs. These where both wristwatches as is our focus here, but also various timekeepers for military, aviation and automotive purposes.As times grew even harsher, Lemania decided to join Omega and Tissot in SSHI in 1932.The deal was that Lemania would get fresh capital and access to a wider and stronger sales organisation, and the other brands within SSHI would get access to the technically advanced movements made by Lemania. Mr. Marius Meylan, CEO of Lemania, was granted a seat at the board of SSHI at the time of merger, and Omega suddenly had access to top grade chronographs, allowing them to become the official supplier to the 1932 Los Angeles Olympics.Omega has been the official Olympic timekeepers ever since!Within SSHI at this time Omega was the luxury brand, Tissot the budget alternative and Lemania the technically advanced “tool watch” supplier.This story lead us back to the development of the caliber 321: Lemania started the manufacturing of the CH27 as early as in 1941. In 1942 the first Omega version was shown as the 27CHRO (later named 320 and 321).Omega themselves states the movements as having been designed and built by Lemania so little room for discussion here.The 320/321/CH27 was manufactured for the next 25+ years. Outside of SSHI various versions of the chronograph movements was used by other companies. Even Patek Philippe, Audmars Piguet and others have used the Lemania CH27 as basis for some of their finest chronograph movements.Breguet has a version for sale with a Tourbillion escapement as well for those of you with really deep pockets. Edited October 3, 2014 by sneer 0 Omega Speedmaster 105.002, Rolex GMT 1675, Zenith El Primero A384, Tag Heuer Monaco cal12, Heuer Montreal cal12, Breitling Long Playing, Certina Chronolympic cal234, Zenith Defy Subsea 600mt, Breitling Chronomatic... parę, ...i sam nie wiem kiedy to się skończy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
myslu 0 #72124 Posted October 3, 2014 Zsunął się z ręki 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wasyl 730 #72125 Posted October 3, 2014 A ja wieczorową porą z kolejnym super potworemPozdrawiam, 0 WasylMam różne zegarki Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
